Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. Better Value Holding Private Limited

High Court 13 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. Better Value Holding Private Limited
Date of order
13 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. Better Value Holding Private Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 2.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08, although several questions have been raised in the memo of appeal, the basic dispute is whether the Tribunal was justified in treating the income earned from sale and purchase of shares as capital gains and not income from business as cont...

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2028 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Pune..Appellant. Versus Better Value Holding Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta, Senior Advocate with Ms.Padma Divakar for the appellant.Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 13[th] March 2013 P.C. : Office objections waived. 2.In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08, although several questions have been raised in the memo of appeal, the basic dispute is whether the Tribunal was justified in treating the income earned from sale and purchase of shares as capital gains and not income from business as contended by the Revenue. 3.The Tribunal in the impugned order has followed the decision of this Court in an appeal filed by the Revenue in the respondent – assessee's own case being Income Tax Appeal (L) No.703 of 2011. In the aforesaid appeal, this Court by its order dated 8[th] August 2011 refused to entertain the appeal by the Revenue. The Revenue has not been able to point out any distinguishing features in this assessment year from the facts relevant to the order dated 8[th] August 2011 passed by this Court. 4.In these circumstances, we see no reason to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan