Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. National Cooperative Housing Society Limited

High Court 12 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. National Cooperative Housing Society Limited
Date of order
12 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
1997-98
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – I, Pune v. National Cooperative Housing Society Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.All the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1038 OF 2004ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1039 OF 2004ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1046 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, Pune ..Appellant. Versus National Cooperative Housing Society Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 12TH AUGUST 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel for the respondent – assessee. Perused appeal. This appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law : “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the transfer fee received by the assessee society is not chargeable to tax relying on the decision of the Special Bench of the ITAT, Mumbai, in the case of Walkeshwar Triveni Coop Housing Society Limited V/s. ITO (ITA No.4397/Mum/2001 for AY 1997-98) reported in (2003) 80 TTJ (Mum) (SB) 673. 2.Reading of the aforesaid question would unequivocally goes to show that it is in relation to the transfer fee received by the society. The question of chargeability of tax was the subject matter of consideration before the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court, lead case being Income Tax Appeal No.931 of 2004 (Sindh Cooperative Housing Society V/s. ITO), wherein the issue was considered in detail and the Division Bench of this Court was pleased to record a finding that the transfer fee received by the Society was not chargeable to tax on the principles of mutuality. Since the issue raised in these appeals is squarely covered by the Division Bench of this Court, the appeals are liable to be dismissed for the reasons recorded therein. The question is accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. 3.All the appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan