In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Dudhganga Vedganga, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.as to costs. [ A.A.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6636 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I
.. Appellant
Vs
Dudhganga Vedganga
.. Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the the Appellant
Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar for the Respondent
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE : 13th JULY, 2011.
1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Kisanveer Satara Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd [Income
Tax Appeal No. 930 of 2008] decided on 30th June 2009.
2. In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.as to costs.
[ A.A. SAYED, J ]
[ J.P. DEVADHAR, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue