The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I v. M/S Apoorva Properties & Estate
High Court
25 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I v. M/S Apoorva Properties & Estate
Date of order
25 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-I v. M/S Apoorva Properties & Estate, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
BDPPS
NMA/587/2014 WITHNMA/588/2014 WITH
RPAL/100/2011 & 101/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.587 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.100 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.883 OF 2011WITH
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.100 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income-tax -IPune
…. Applicant.
(Original Petitioner)
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Income-tax-I
…. Petitioner.
V/s
M/s Apoorva Properties & Estate
Pvt. Ltd.
…. Respondent.
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.588 OF 2014
IN
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.101 OF 2011
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.940 OF 2011
WITH
REVIEW PETITION (L) NO.101 OF 2011
NMA/587/2014 WITHNMA/588/2014 WITHRPAL/100/2011 & 101/2011
The Commissioner of Income-tax -IPune
…. Applicant.(Original Petitioner)
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Income-tax-I
…. Petitioner.
V/s
M/s Apoorva Properties & EstatePvt. Ltd.
…. Respondent.
None for the Applicant/Petitioner.Mr. Jas Sanghari with Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala i/b P & S Legal for the Respondent.
CORAM: V. M. KANADE &
MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
25[th] August, 2016 (In Chamber at 2.35 P.M.)
DATE:
P.C.:-
1.Both the above Notices of Motion have been filed for condonation of delay in taking out the Review Petitions which have been filed for reviewing the order dated 22/2/2011 passed by this Court.
2.We are informed by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent that, in fact, the Review Petitioner had challenged the
NMA/587/2014 WITHNMA/588/2014 WITHRPAL/100/2011 & 101/2011
said order by filing SLP in the Apex Court and the said SLP has been dismissed on merits on 28/4/2015.
3.In view of this, Notices of Motion and Review Petitions do not survive and they are disposed of accordingly.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.M. KANADE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue