The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Punjab State Warehousing Corp
High Court
14 Sep 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Punjab State Warehousing Corp
Date of order
14 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S Punjab State Warehousing Corp, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No. 436 of 2010
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I
Versus
M/s Punjab State Warehousing Corp.
ITA No. 436 of 2010
Date of Decision: 14.9.2010
....Appellant.
...Respondent.
CORAM:-HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL.HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.
PRESENT: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the appellant.
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.
1.This appeal has been preferred by the revenue underSection 206A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench (B), Chandigarhpassed in ITA No. 459/Chandi/2008 dated 23.9.2009, for theassessment year 2006-07, proposing following question of law:-
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase the Hon'ble ITAT was right in law in allowingrelief to the assessee without appreciating the factsthat the amount was due from Punjab Governmenton account of excess payment?”
2.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that thematter is covered against the revenue by order of this Court dated
ITA No. 436 of 201030.7.2010 in ITA Nos. 275 and 277 of 2010.
3.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE
September 14, 2010(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)gbsJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.