The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I… v. M/S.v.t. Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.…
High Court
19 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I… v. M/S.v.t. Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.…
Date of order
19 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I… v. M/S.v.t. Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.…, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is devoid of any merits and is, therefore, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
bsb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1555 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I… Appellant
v/s
M/s.V.T. Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.… Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta, senior counsel i/by Vipul Arun Bajpayee for the appellant.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 19TH MARCH, 2014
P. C. :
1Heard Mr.Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. Perused the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as also the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal found that the shares were traded as investment, they were disclosed and, therefore, the proceeds were treated as long term capital gain and not a business income. That is the finding of fact rendered consistent with the material produced.
In such circumstances and when the question was of the assessee's
intent, we find that no substantial question of law arises for determination and consideration. The appeal is devoid of any merits
and is, therefore, dismissed.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.)
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.