In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Parner Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 434 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I
...Appellant
Versus
Parner Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ...
Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant
None for the Respondent.
CORAM:B ILAL NAZKIandSS. SHIDNE, JJ. DATE:JULY 2, 2008
SS. SHIDNE, JJ.
P.C.:-
It is submitted that the question framed in this appeal assubstantial question of law has already been decided by this Court in301 ITR 191 against the Department. The appeal is accordinglydismissed.
BILAL NAZKI, J.
S.S. SHINDE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.