The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Amritsar v. Sh. Ajay Kumar
High Court
15 Sep 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Amritsar v. Sh. Ajay Kumar
Date of order
15 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Amritsar v. Sh. Ajay Kumar, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: This appeal is accordingly allowed in the same terms. | S.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
sr. No. 205 (2)ITADTT2(14Decided on: 15.09.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Amritsar..... Appellant
VERSUS
Sh. Ajay Kumar..... Respondent
CORAMHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE DEBPAK SIBAL
PresentMr.Denesh Goyal, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.Pankaj Jain, Senior Advocate, with|Mr.Divya Suri, Advocate, andMr.Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent.=======
DEEPAK SIBAL J.
The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 has been preferred by the revenue to challenge therein order dated28.02.2014, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench,Amritsar.
The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2003-04.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the result in thisappeal will follow the result in ITA-286-2014 “The Commissioner ofIncome Tax-II, Amritsar Vs. M/s Ajay Electronic, Pathankot’, allowed byus by our separate order and judgment passed today.
This appeal is accordingly allowed in the same terms.
| S.J. VAZIFDAR |
CHIEF JUSTICE
15.09.2016
shamsher
| DEEPAK SIBAL |
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speakingWhether reportable
*Yes / No*Yes / No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.