The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Central Iv, Chennai v. M/S.tulsyan Nec Ltd
High Court
16 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Central Iv, Chennai v. M/S.tulsyan Nec Ltd
Date of order
16 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii Central Iv, Chennai v. M/S.tulsyan Nec Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the instant cases, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Tax Case (Appeal) No.2 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IICentral IV, Chennai. ...AppellantVs.
M/s.Tulsyan NEC Ltd3, Apex Plaza, MG RoadNungambakkam, Chennai-34.
...Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the common order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai dated 13.10.2010 in ITANo.1420/Mds/2009 against the order passed by the Commissioner ofIncome Tax(A)-1, Chennai dated 01/06/2009, made in ITANo.321/08-09 and against the Assessment order passed by theAsst.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle IV(3), Chennai,dated 31/12/2008, made in AABCT3720E
For Appellant : Ms.K.G.Usha Rani Junior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenue callingin question the correctness of the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, by raising thefollowing substantial question of law:
“ Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case,the Income Tax Tribunal was right in law in holding
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
that disallowance of interest on loan for constructionamounting to Rs.47,13,216/- was to be allowed for theassessment year 2003-04?”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circular instructionissued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes vide CircularNo.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it is stipulated thatappeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Department before theHigh Court in cases where the tax effect does not exceedRs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).
3. In the instant cases, the tax effect is said to be lessthan the monetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal filedby the Revenue is dismissed as not pressed, keeping open thesubstantial questions of law for determination in an appropriatecase.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarKSTTo1. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'B' Bench, Chennai.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-1 Chennai.3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income – Tax, Central Circle IV(3) Chennai.+1cc to Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.23079
T.C.(A) No.2 of 2016
EV(CO)RN(27/05/2020)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.