Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kol...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Janhavi Investment Private Limited

High Court 16 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Janhavi Investment Private Limited
Date of order
16 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
1996-1997, 1997-1998
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Janhavi Investment Private Limited, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1132 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax – II, Kolhapur Versus Janhavi Investment Private Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.Tejveer Singh for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ. DATE : 16[th] January 2013 P.C. : 1.In this appeal filed by the Revenue for assessment year 1996-1997, following question of law has been proposed for our consideration. “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in holding that the 'other income' of Rs.12,97,28,320/- is to be considered as business income of the respondent, when the same has correctly been taxed by the assessing officer under the head 'income from other sources' ?” 2.The Tribunal by the impugned order dated 28[th] February 2012 has allowed the respondent – assessee's appeal by following the decision in the assessee's own case for assessment year 1997-1998. The Revenue has accepted the order of the Tribunal for assessment year 1997-1998. No reason has been pointed out to take a view different from the view taken by the Tribunal for assessment year 1997-1998. Further, in the very same assessment year, the Tribunal by order dated 7[th] July 2011 in an Appeal against Section 263 order had held that the interest income is taxable under the head 'profits and gains of the business' and the Tribunal in the impugned order has followed the same. 3.In these circumstances, we do not propose to entertain the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. Sanklecha, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan