Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kol...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Ratnagiri Zilla Madyamik Adhyapak Sahakari Pat Pedhi Limited

High Court 08 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Ratnagiri Zilla Madyamik Adhyapak Sahakari Pat Pedhi Limited
Date of order
08 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Kolhapur v. Ratnagiri Zilla Madyamik Adhyapak Sahakari Pat Pedhi Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2944 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – II, Kolhapur Versus Ratnagiri Zilla Madyamik Adhyapak Sahakari Pat Pedhi Limited ..Appellant. ..Respondent. None for the appellant.None for the respondent. P.C. : CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ. DATE : 8[th] Ferbuary, 2010. 1.The office objections are waived. The registry is directed to register the appeal. 2.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has furnished cogent reasons for deleting the penalty imposed on the assessee under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged contravention of Section 269SS. The assessee, as noted by the Tribunal, is a Credit Cooperative Society, which was carrying on its business in a mofussil area. The Tribunal relying upon its earlier decision has held that the assessee has held a bona fide though erroneous belief in regard to the inapplicability of the provisions of Section 269SS. 3.Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances as noted in the order of the Tribunal, we are of the view that no substantial question of law would arise in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan