In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Mumbai v. M/S. Neha Mad Films Combine, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, appeal is dismissed for default.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1898 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Mumbai...Appellant.vs.
M/s. Neha Mad Films Combine.
..Respondent.
None for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2012
PC:
None for the appellant. Even on the last date of
hearing i.e. on 19/11/2012 none appeared on behalf of the appellant. Hence, appeal is dismissed for default.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue