Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpu...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. M/S Rishab Trading Co. Baccharaj Bhavan

High Court 21 Oct 2010 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

21 Oct 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. M/S Rishab Trading Co. Baccharaj Bhavan, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 81 OF 2009 (The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nagpur ..vs.. M/s Rishab Trading Co. Baccharaj Bhavan, Wardha) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's order ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the appellant.Shri C.J. Thakar, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 21st OCTOBER, 2010 Learned Counsel for the appellant states that he has instructions to withdraw the appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per law. JUDGE JUDGE pma

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.