Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpu...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Or Directions And Registrar's Orders

High Court 26 Aug 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Or Directions And Registrar's Orders
Date of order
26 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Or Directions And Registrar's Orders, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

2608itl26.04 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.26 OF 2004 (The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nagpur vs. Smt. Reeta Vijaykumar Pithisaria) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders. Shri S.N. Bhattad, Advocate with Shri Abhishekh Bhoot,Advocate for appellant. Shri C.J. Thakkar, Advocate for respondent. ------- CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DATED : AUGUST 26, 2016 Shri Bhattad, learned Counsel for theappellant Department, fairly states that in view of theCircular No. 21/2015 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, the income tax appeal is liable to bedisposed of in view of low tax effect. The learnedCounsel seeks permission to withdraw the income taxappeal. Permission is granted. The income taxappeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE 2/2 CERTIFICATE I certify that this order uploaded is a trueand correct copy of original signed order. Uploaded by :Uploaded on :Kamal H. Jeswani29/08/2016Private Secretary
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan