The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Kalamna, Nagpur
High Court
24 Sep 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Kalamna, Nagpur
Date of order
24 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Nagpur v. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Kalamna, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Income Tax Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.14 OF 2007
(The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nagpur ..vs.. Shri Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, Kalamna, Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's order
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant,Shri C.J. Thakar, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 24th SEPTEMBER,2010
Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal as similar questions are raised by the revenue in Income Tax Appeal No.13/2007. The Income Tax Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of court fees as per law.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue