The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Paota C Raod, Jodhpur v. Suresh Kumar

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6657 / 2013 1.The Union of India through Secretary to Government of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi.India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi. 2.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Paota C Road, Jodhpur.Jodhpur. 3. The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Paota C Raod, Jodhpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1.Suresh Kumar S/o Sh. Ramesh Kumar ji, B/c Brahmin, aged about-29 years, r/o Gudirya jav, Pilkani Nadi, Sumerpur.about-29 years, r/o Gudirya jav, Pilkani Nadi, Sumerpur. 2.Ramesh Kumar s/o Sh. Gopi lal Ji, B/c Chipa, aged about 31 years, r/o Gandhi Chowk, Sardar Patel Marg, Jalore.years, r/o Gandhi Chowk, Sardar Patel Marg, Jalore. 3.Dinesh Vaishnav s/o Sh. Hari Ram Ji, B/c Brahmin, aged about 23 years, r/o Railway Colony, Mokalsar, District Barmer.about 23 years, r/o Railway Colony, Mokalsar, District Barmer. 4.Raju Ram s/o Sh. Amra Ji, B/c Mali, aged about 36, r/o Behind FCI Godown, Jalore.Behind FCI Godown, Jalore. 5.Chandra Prakash s/o Sh. Rameshwar lal Ji, B/o Ramawat, aged about 25 years, r/o Azad Chowk, Ramawat Street, Barmer.aged about 25 years, r/o Azad Chowk, Ramawat Street, Barmer. All are at present employed as Daily Wager/ Casual labour in the Sumerpur, Jalore and Barmer Income Tax office under control of Respondent no.2 &3 i.e. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Paota C Road, Jodhpur. 6.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, at Jodhpur.Jodhpur. _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. KK BissaFor Respondent(s) : None present _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. MOOLCHANDANIOrder 22/02/2017 This writ petition was presented on 27.05.2013. On the sameday, office pointed out three very minor defects. No efforts weremade to remove the defects for petty long time. On 24.02.2014,the writ petition was listed before the court but none was presentto pursue the same. Even then a week’s time was granted to doneedful. No steps were even thereafter have been taken to curethe defects though twelve further opportunities were allowed tothe petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter,therefore, no efforts have been made to remove the defects since27.05.2013. The same is dismissed for want of prosecution as wellas in default. (G.R. MOOLCHANDANI)J. (GOVIND MATHUR)J. Anil Kumar Choudhary