Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Pun...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Pune v. Mahendra H. Dugad

High Court 08 Sep 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Pune v. Mahendra H. Dugad
Date of order
08 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Pune v. Mahendra H. Dugad, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.51 OF 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.300 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income Tax – II, Pune..Appellant. VersusMahendra H. Dugad..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sudhir Hardikar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 8th September 2011 1.By consent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). (K.K. Tated, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan