In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Pune v. Mahendra H. Dugad, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.300 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax – II, Pune..Appellant.
Versus
Mahendra H. Dugad..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sudhir Hardikar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 8th September 2011
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised by the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Sandeep C. Dugad,
being Income Tax Appeal No.285 of 2005 has been dismissed by us today i.e. 8[th] September 2011.
2.For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue