Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii, Pun...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii, Pune v. National Heavy Engineering Co. Private Limited

High Court 06 Oct 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii, Pune v. National Heavy Engineering Co. Private Limited
Date of order
06 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ii, Pune v. National Heavy Engineering Co. Private Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2016 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2017 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax - II, Pune ..Appellant. Versus National Heavy Engineering Co. Private Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 6TH OCTOBER 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard. Admittedly, the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Associated Cables P Limited reported in [2006] 286 ITR 596 (Bom). Said Judgment is relied upon by the Tribunal. No substantial question of law arises in these appeals. The appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan