In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Ii, Thane v. Krishnakumar K Ashar, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1931 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – II, Thane..Appellant.
Versus
Krishnakumar K Ashar
..Respondent.
Mr.S.K. Bhatnagar with Mr.N.R. Prajapati for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The tribunal has recorded finding in para 2.5 of the impugned order, which is nothing but finding of fact based on appreciation of evidence, with which no fault can be found. No substantial question of law said to be arise from the order of the tribunal.
2.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue