The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Heard
High Court
09 Aug 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Heard
Date of order
09 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Heard, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
T
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1268 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 867 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-II..Appellant. Vs.
Smt.Nirmalabai P Gandhi
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 9th AUGUST, 2011.
P.C.
1. Heard.
2. Since the revenue has already filed a Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court against dismissal of the appeal, counsel for the revenue seeks to withdraw the notice of motion. The notice of motion is allowed to be withdrawn. before the Apex Court against dismissal of the appeal, counsel for the revenue seeks to withdraw the notice of motion. The notice of motion is allowed to be withdrawn.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue