Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Mit...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Mitusubishi Corporation India P. Ltd

High Court 16 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

16 Feb 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Mitusubishi Corporation India P. Ltd, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the aforesaid and since the issue which was proposed to be canvassed stands answered against the Revenue in light of the majority opinion, we dismiss the instant appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 180/2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ..... Appellant Through: None. versus MITUSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R% 15.04.2024 CM APPL. 22058/2024 (for directions) & ITA 180/2014 We take note of the opinion rendered by the Third Judge consequent to a reference made in terms of Volume V, Chapter IV, Part II- F(b), Rule 10 of the Delhi High Court Rules. In view of the aforesaid and since the issue which was proposed to be canvassed stands answered against the Revenue in light of the majority opinion, we dismiss the instant appeal. The application stands disposed of. YASHWANT VARMA, J. APRIL 15, 2024/RW PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.