Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S.aharnish Hotels Pvt.ltd

High Court 13 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

13 Mar 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. M/S.aharnish Hotels Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.319 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.319 OF 2002 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.319 OF 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax -II .. Appellant V/s M/s.Aharnish Hotels Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.Kotangale for the Appellant. Mr.A.P.Sathe with Mr.Mandar Vaidya for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 13th March, 2007. DATE : 13th March, 2007. DATE : 13th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal. Appeal is therefore allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the rules. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.