The Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii v. Sadhana Umakant Dhake

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 TAX APPEAL NO.63 OF 2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IIVERSUS SADHANA UMAKANT DHAKE AND 902 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.15 OF 2012THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ABADVERSUSMIRZA QUAISAR BAIG AND 903 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.27 OF 2014 WITH ITA/28/2014 WITH ITA/29/2014 IN ITA/28/2014WITH ITA/30/2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), NAGPURVERSUSM/S MULAY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND 904 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.100 OF 2016THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, AURANGABADVERSUSM/S PEOPLES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND 905 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.68 OF 2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 NASHIKVERSUSAADHUNIK INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD.,JALGAON AND 906 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.73 OF 2018THR PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 NASHIKVERSUSCHARUSHILA SURESH BOROLE AND 907 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2 OF 2019 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 AURANGABADVERSUSM/S ABHAY CONTEX PVT LTD., JALNA AND 908 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3 OF 2020 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1 AURANGABADVERSUS M/S. PARESH FARMS PVT LTD., AURANGABAD ... Mr. Alok Sharma, senior panel advocate for appellant. ... CORAM :SUNIL P. DESHMUKH ANDABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE :11[th] March 2021. PER COURT :- 1.Matters are appearing on board for correction of date since the date of letter instructing learned advocate towithdraw the matters is printed as “01-02-2021”, which infact is “09-02-2021”. 2.As such, the date appearing in order dated 17[th] February 2021 be corrected as “09-02-2021” in place of“01-02-2021”. Correction be carried out and the correcteddate should be deemed to be part of the order dated 17[th]February 2021. 3.Rest of the order dated 17[th] February 2021remains the same. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) VD_Dhirde (SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.)