The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri. Akil Gulamali Somji
High Court
15 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri. Akil Gulamali Somji
Date of order
15 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii v. Shri. Akil Gulamali Somji, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the aforesaid appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1416 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1417 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1418 OF 2012WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1419 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-II...Appellant.v.Shri. Akil Gulamali Somji...Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 15TH JANUARY, 2013
PC:
In all these appeals by the revenue the following question
of law has been formulated for consideration by this court.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT did not err in holding that no approval could be said to have been given when in fact the Joint CIT has duly applied his mind and corrected the draft assessment order and the changes were incorporated by the AO in the final assessment order?
2)The question of law as framed proceeds on the basis that the approval of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has not been obtained. This is factually incorrect as the impugned order dated 30/3/2012 in Para 7 records as under :
“In an alternative submission, the learned D.R. requested to set aside the file to the A.O. or learned CIT(A), so that defect in not obtaining the approval of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax can be cured”.
3)Admittedly the finding of fact was recorded by the Tribunal that no prior approval of the Joint Commissioner was taken before Income Tax officer passing the order. In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question. Hence, the aforesaid appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S.SANKELCHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.