Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Shr...

The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Shri Jayendra Mulji Dodhia

High Court 31 Mar 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Shri Jayendra Mulji Dodhia
Date of order
31 Mar 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii v. Shri Jayendra Mulji Dodhia, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: For the aforesaid reasons there is no merit in this Appeal which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.182 of 2009 The Commissioner of Income-tax-II..Appellant Vs. Shri Jayendra Mulji Dodhia ..Respondent Mr. S.K. Bhatnagar with Mr. N.R. Prajapati for the Appellant. Mr. Ajay R. Singh, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 31ST MARCH, 2009 CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: 31ST MARCH, 2009 P.C.: P.C.: . The question which arises in this Appeal is the same as to what had arisen in Income Tax Appeal No.171 of 2009 which has been decided by us by a separate order today relying on our earlier judgment in Income Tax Appeal No.128 of 2009 decided on 24th February, 2009. . For the aforesaid reasons there is no merit in this Appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan