The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichennai v. M/S.super Spinning Mills Ltdelgi Towers, Green Fields737-D, Puliakulam Roadcoimbatore
High Court
02 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichennai v. M/S.super Spinning Mills Ltdelgi Towers, Green Fields737-D, Puliakulam Roadcoimbatore
Date of order
02 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iichennai v. M/S.super Spinning Mills Ltdelgi Towers, Green Fields737-D, Puliakulam Roadcoimbatore, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal under Section 260A, Section 80IA of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IIChennai
...Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Super Spinning Mills LtdELGI Towers, Green Fields737-D, Puliakulam RoadCoimbatore....Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal 'D' Bench, Chennai dated 21/04/2011 in ITANo.1672/Mds/2008, against the order dated 26/05/2008, made inAppeal No.257/07 on the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Coimbatore, against the order of the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax Company Circle 1(2), Coimbatore,dated 29/12/2007, made in AADCS0672G u/sec.143(3) of theIncome Tax Act 1961 for the Assessment year 2005-06.
-----
For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Senior Standing Counsel
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.VINEETKOTHARI,J)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenuecalling in question the correctness of the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai, by raisingthe following substantial question of law:
1
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal wasright in law in holding that the assessee's threewind mills installed at Muppandal, Palladam andSanganeri were eligible for claiming deductionunder Section 80IA and that too, considering eachwind mill separate undertaking is valid?”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circularinstruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes videCircular No.17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, wherein, it isstipulated that appeals shall not be filed/pursued by theDepartment before the High Court in cases where the tax effectdoes not exceed Rs.1,00,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore).
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.