The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Dr. R.l. Narang
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Dr. R.l. Narang
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Dr. R.l. Narang, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 671 of 2008 (O&M)
Decided on : 25.01.2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Ludhiana
Versus
Dr. R.L. Narang
. . . Appellant
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RAJ RAHUL GARG
PRESENT: Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocatefor the appellant-revenue.
Mr. S.K. Mukhi, Advocatefor the respondent-assessee.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
The total addition as depicted in the Assessment Order is to thetune of ` 32,05,000/- and therefore, the tax would be less than ` 20.00 lacs thatis the limit fixed by the C.B.D.T., New Delhi vide Circular No.21/2015, dated10.12.2015. Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue submitted that in viewthereof, the present case is covered and may be dismissed as withdrawn as perthe aforesaid circular. However, liberty be granted to the revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal in case something survives therein.
2.Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is, however,clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not be taken to beaffirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legal issue asclaimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in an appropriatecase.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
January 25, 2016
J.Ram
(RAJ RAHUL GARG) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.