The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Market Committee, Dharamkot, Distt. Moga
High Court
03 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Market Committee, Dharamkot, Distt. Moga
Date of order
03 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. Market Committee, Dharamkot, Distt. Moga, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Moga ---Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH Present:-Mr.Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for the appellant.J.S.KHEHAR, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellant very fairly states that thecontroversy involved in the instant appeal has been adjudicated upon by thisC...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No.906 of 2008 Date of Decision:-3.2.2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Ludhiana
Versus
---Appellant
Market Committee, Dharamkot, Distt. Moga
---Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH
Present:-Mr.Rajesh Sethi, Advocate for the appellant.J.S.KHEHAR, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the appellant very fairly states that thecontroversy involved in the instant appeal has been adjudicated upon by thisCourt in Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Amritsar, Versus MarketCommittee, Dhariwal (ITA No.654 of 2005 decided on 14.3.2007).In view of the above, the instant appeal is dismissed in terms ofthe order passed by this Court in ITA No.654 of 2005.
(J.S.Khehar) Judge
(Nawab Singh)
3.2.2009 JudgeAS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue