The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. M/S Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd
High Court
03 Oct 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. M/S Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd
Date of order
03 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Ludhiana v. M/S Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CM-16703-05-CI1-2019 in/andITA-174-2008(0&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
237°CM-16703-05-C 11-2019 in/anITA-174-2008(0&M)Date of decision :3.190.201
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Ludhiana...... Appellant
Versus
M/s Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd....... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present ;Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel forfor the appellant.
Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocatefor the respondent.
333
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
CM;16703FCI];2019
This is an application tor exemption from filing certified copy
of Circulars ( Annexure R-1| and R-2)
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is
allowed.
CM;16704FCI]m2019
This is an application for placing on record the accompanying
Circulars ( Annexure R-1 and R-2).
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is allowed
and abovesaid documents are taken on record.
CM-16703-05-CI1-2019 in/andITA-174-2008(0&M)
CM16705Cll2019
This is an application for dismissal of the appeal filed by thedepartment/Revenue in view of the Circulars dated 11.7.2018 and 8.8.2019,
For the reasons recorded in the application, the same is
allowed.
Main case
inLearned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in CircularNo.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes,further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read withLetter No.F.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he _ hainstructions to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prayed that libertybe granted to the appellant-revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal, in case something survives therein.
|Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4.Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, thepending C.M, if any also stands disposed of,
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
3.10.2019anuradha
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable |
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.