In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax -Iii, Mumbai v. A.r.joshi,J, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Ladda
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 850 of 2011.
The Commissioner of Income-tax -III, Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
Smt. Minaxi P. Satra
... Respondent.
Mr Vimal Gupta with Padma Divakar for the appellant.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 23 December, 2011.
P.C. :-
Counsel for the parties fairly state that the questions raised by the Revenue in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of M/s Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Ltd vs. DCIT reported in 328 ITR 81. In this view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue