The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Laxmansingh T. Bhonsale (Huf
High Court
10 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Laxmansingh T. Bhonsale (Huf
Date of order
10 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Nagpur v. Laxmansingh T. Bhonsale (Huf, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.45/2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Nagpur
...Versus...
Laxmansingh T. Bhonsale (HUF)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Shri Anand Parchure, Adv. for appellant S/Shri C.J./S.C. Thakar, Advs. for respondent
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.DATE: 10.10.2013
In view of the order dated 10.10.2013 in Income Tax Appeal No.47/2013, the cause for filing this appeal would not survive.
Hence, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Wadkar
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.