The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iii, Pune v. Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited, Pune
High Court
08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iii, Pune v. Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited, Pune
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iii, Pune v. Rupee Cooperative Bank Limited, Pune, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3545 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, PuneVersusRupee Cooperative Bank Limited, Pune
..Appellant...Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3653 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – IV, PuneVersusArjun Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Solapur
..Appellant...Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3740 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, PuneVersusRajarshri Shahu Sahakari Bank Limited, Pune
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent in 3651 & 3652/2008.None for the respondent in all other matters.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. The issue sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. The Solapur NagariAudyogic Sahakari Bank Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.46 of 2008decided on 16th June 2009.
2.In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue