Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, Pu...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, Pune v. The United Western Bank Limited

High Court 12 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, Pune v. The United Western Bank Limited
Date of order
12 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Iii, Pune v. The United Western Bank Limited, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue on the ground that the approval of the Committee of Disputes was not obtained by the Revenue.

Decision: In this view of the matter, order dated 31[st] August 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.573/PN/2009 relating to assessment year 2005-06 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Tribunal for consideration afresh on its own merits.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2634 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - III, Pune..Appellant. Versus The United Western Bank Limited ..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 12[th] July, 2011. 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue on the ground that the approval of the Committee of Disputes was not obtained by the Revenue. 2.The Apex Court in the case of Electronics Corporation of India Limited V/s. Union of India reported in (2011) 51 DTR 193 has held that the approval of the Committee of Disputes is not mandatory. In this view of the matter, order dated 31[st] August 2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.573/PN/2009 relating to assessment year 2005-06 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the Tribunal for consideration afresh on its own merits. 3.The appeal is accordingly disposed off with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan