The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Vyankatesh V. Mandke
High Court
02 May 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Vyankatesh V. Mandke
Date of order
02 May 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Pune v. Vyankatesh V. Mandke, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2786 OF 2010
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6921 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Pune..Appellant.
Vs.
Vyankatesh V. Mandke
Prop. M/s. V. Graphics & Arts.. Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
P.C.
DATE : 2ND MAY, 2011.
1.Heard.
2.None for the respondent though served. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit in support of notice of motion, delay is condoned.
3.Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a) and (b).
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue