In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii Thane v. Heard The Learned Counsel For The Parties, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [J P DEVADHAR, J]
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
lgc
1 ITXA NO.686/09.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.686 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax III ThaneversusSmt.Neeta P Karia, Ulhasnagar,
: Appellant.
: Respondent.
Mr. P S Sahadevan for the Appellant.Mr. Jitendra Jain for the Respondent.
CORAM :J P DEVADHAR AND R M SAVANT, JJ.DATED :16[th] NOVEMBER 2010
P.C.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Perused the Appeal.
2
2The learned counsel for both the parties fairly state that the questions raised in this Appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case ofCommissioner of Income Tax v/s. Uttamchand Jain reported in320 ITR
554. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
[R.M.SAVANT, J]
[J P DEVADHAR, J]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue