In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – Iii, Thane v. Income Tax Appeal (L), the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, all these appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.682 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, ThaneVersusSmt.Usha G. Jotwani
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Bhatnagar i/by N.R. Prajapati for the appellant in all the appeals.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2078 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, ThaneVersusShri Hariram Assardas Chugh
..Appellant...Respondent.
None for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2501 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax – III, Thane..Appellant.VersusShyam B. Bulchandani, Ulhasnagar..Respondent.
..Respondent.
Mr.V.S. Hadade for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 31ST AUGUST 2009
P.C. :
1.Learned counsel for the revenue fairly states that the questions raised in these appeals are answered by this Court against the revenue in Income Tax Appeal No.634 of 2009 (CIT V/s. Uttamchand Jain) decided on 2-7-2009.
3.In this view of the matter, all these appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue