The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Gad Logistics (I) Pvt. Ltd
High Court
31 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Gad Logistics (I) Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
31 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Gad Logistics (I) Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 1720 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-III,versus GAD Logistics (I) Pvt. Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
--------
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.............
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 31[st] January, 2013
P.C.:
In this appeal, the revenue has formulated the following questions for our consideration:
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in restoring the issue to the file of CIT(A) w.r.t. the issue of nature of land whether the same is agriculture as well as issue of distance of the said land whether the said land form part of capital asset?b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in restoring the issue to the file of CIT(A) w.r.t. the issue of 2 crores received in cash on the ground that it could be adjudicated only after adjudication of issue of determining the nature of land?
(section 2(14) of the I.T.Act, 1961)
2Since, the Tribunal by the impugned order has restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal.
3Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.