The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S Kantilal Umedrai Amravati
High Court
01 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S Kantilal Umedrai Amravati
Date of order
01 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. M/S Kantilal Umedrai Amravati, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4085 OF 2007
in
I.T.A. NO.55 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax III. Appellant
Vs.
M/s Kantilal Umedrai Amravati ..Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee for AppellantNone for Respondent
CORAM : Dr.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 1st July, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Noneappears for the respondents though served.Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice ofmotion. For the reasons stated in the affidavitin support of the Notice of motion, suficient
cause is made out. Hence, the Notice of motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
{ A.V.Nirgude, J }
{ A.V.Nirgude, J }
{ Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
{ Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
{ Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue