Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Shri. Omprakash M.gupta (Huf

High Court 28 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Jan 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Shri. Omprakash M.gupta (Huf, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28TH JANUARY,2008. would not arise and consequently, the appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.487 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income tax-III. ..Appellant. Vs. Shri. Omprakash M.Gupta (HUF). ..Respondent. Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for theAppellant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 28TH JANUARY,2008. would not arise and consequently, the appeal stands dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.