The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sudipta M Bhaumick
High Court
11 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sudipta M Bhaumick
Date of order
11 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. Sudipta M Bhaumick, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: C/TAXAP/1421/2008 ORDER 3.The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in the light of the Circular dated 11[th] July, 2018.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 1421 of 2008
================================================================THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIIVersusSUDIPTA M BHAUMICK
================================================================
Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANIandHONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A. P. THAKER
Date : 11/02/2019 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1.Heard Mrs. Mauna Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Swati Soparkar, learned advocate for the respondent.
2.It is an admitted position between the parties that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/-. Under the circumstances, in the light of the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11[th] July, 2018 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes which provides that no appeal wherein the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/- shall be filed before the High Court and has also been made retrospectively applicable to pending appeals, the learned senior standing counsel for the appellant does not press the present appeal.
C/TAXAP/1421/2008 ORDER
3.The appeal is accordingly disposed of as not pressed in the light of the Circular dated 11[th] July, 2018. However, in case there is any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if for any reason, the circular is not applicable, it would be open for the appellant to seek revival of the appeal.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
R.S. MALEK
(A. P. THAKER, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.