The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iiichennai v. M/S.pioneer Wincon Ltd
High Court
11 Nov 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iiichennai v. M/S.pioneer Wincon Ltd
Date of order
11 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2003-04, 2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax Iiichennai v. M/S.pioneer Wincon Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid submission, the tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
T.C.A. No. 986 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTHand
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No. 986 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax IIIChennai. .. Appellant
vs
M/s.Pioneer Wincon Ltd.30/1A Harrington ChamberII Floor, B Block,Abdul Razaq 1[st] Street,Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras B Bench, dated 09.04.2010 in ITA No. 1149/Mds/2008 for assessment year 2003-04.
For Appellant::Ms.V. PushpaSenior Standing Counsel
For Respondent::Mr.A.S.Sriraman
T.C.A. No. 986 of 2010
DR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN.,J.
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J)Ms.V. Pushpa, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue the appeal relating to assessment year 2003-2004 and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of the low tax effect per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, the tax case appeal is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the question of law open to be decided in an appropriate matter. No costs.
[A.S.M., J] [G.A.M., J]11.11.2024
slIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yesspeaking order
T.C.A.No. 986 of 2010
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.