The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iiipune v. M/S. Homage Raltors Pvt. Ltd
High Court
06 Jul 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iiipune v. M/S. Homage Raltors Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Iiipune v. M/S. Homage Raltors Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3343 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-IIIPune.
Vs.
M/s. Homage Raltors Pvt. Ltd.,
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 6TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 22.10.2009. Perusal of the order of the I.T.A.T. shows that by the said order the I.T.A.T. has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide in accordance with Special Bench decision in the case of Brahma
Associates Vs. JCIT reported in 119 ITD 255. Since the I.T.A.T. has restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. Special Bench decision in the case of Brahma Associates Vs. JCIT(supra) has been considered by this Court in the case of CIT vs. Brahma Associates (Bom) reported in (2011) 51 DTR Judgments page 299. In this view of the matter, the Assessing Officer while passing fresh order in accordance with law shall take into consideration the decision of this Court in the case of CIT vs. Brahma Associates (Bom).
2.costs.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No order as to
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.