Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iiipune v...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iiipune v. M/S.h.h.engineers, Pune

High Court 08 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

08 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iiipune v. M/S.h.h.engineers, Pune, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.236 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IIIPune. ...Appellant vs. M/s.H.H.Engineers, Pune. ...Respondent. --- Mr.Vimal Gupta, for Appellant. P.C.:- CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 8[th] August, 2008. Heard the learned Counsel appearing forappellant. The decision of the tribunal turned on thefinding of facts recorded by him. No question of lawarises. Hence, the appeal is rejected. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.