The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Nashik v. Shobhraj T. Chandwani
High Court
09 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Nashik v. Shobhraj T. Chandwani
Date of order
09 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Ii,Nashik v. Shobhraj T. Chandwani, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In that light of the matter, Tax Appeals are disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2005- WITH - TAX APPEAL NO.80 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-Tax-II,Nashik
..Appellant
Versus
Shobhraj T. Chandwani,Prop. Dinesh Agency, Bhusawal,District Jalgaon
..Respondent
Mr Alok Sharma, Standing Counsel for appellantMr R.M. Sharma Advocate for respondent
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. DHAVALE, JJ
PER COURT
DATE : 9[th] February 2018
Heard Mr Sharma, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant and Mr R.T. Sharma, learned Counsel for respondent.
2.The tax effect is below Rs.20 lakhs. As per CBDT Circular dated 10.12.2015, the policy decision is taken by the department not to proceed with the appeal below Rs.20 lakhs.
3.In that light of the matter, Tax Appeals are disposed of. No costs.
( A.M. DHAVALE, J.)
( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
vvr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue