The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Nashik v. Shree Dadasaheb Rawal Shindkhedataluka Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd
High Court
05 Oct 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Nashik v. Shree Dadasaheb Rawal Shindkhedataluka Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd
Date of order
05 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I,Nashik v. Shree Dadasaheb Rawal Shindkhedataluka Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.In view of the aforesaid communication and instructions received byMrs Kalpalata Patil - Bharaswadkar, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawnand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ta18.11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO.18 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Nashik
..APPELLANT
VERSUS
Shree Dadasaheb Rawal ShindkhedaTaluka Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd...RESPONDENT
Mrs (Dr.) Kalpalata Patil-Bharaswadkar , Advocate for appellant;Mr R.R. Chandak, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALEAND
MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE : 5th October, 2018
ORAL ORDER:
Mrs Kalalata Patil - Bharaswadkar, learned Counsel appearing onbehalf of the appellant placed on record communication dated 26thSeptember, 2018. The said communication is taken on record and marked"X" for identification. The common ground assigned in this communicationis, the liability involved in the matter is below Rs.50 Lakhs and thereference is made to Circular No.3 of 2018, dated 11th July, 2018, issued bythe C.B.D.T. The Counsel is thus requested to withdraw the appeal.
2.In view of the aforesaid communication and instructions received byMrs Kalpalata Patil - Bharaswadkar, the appeal is allowed to be withdrawnand disposed of.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
amj
AnantManohar Joshi
Digitally signed by AnantManohar JoshiDate: 2018.10.06 10:36:00+0530
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue