Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Interna...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adidas Sourcing Ltd

High Court 05 Aug 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adidas Sourcing Ltd
Date of order
05 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adidas Sourcing Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 722/2019 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue. versus ADIDAS SOURCING LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R % 05.08.2019 1. This is a penalty appeal by the Revenue against an order dated 29[th] January, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 2668/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08. 2. The question sought to be urged is whether the ITAT was right in deleting the penalty imposed on the Respondent for the AY in question? 3. It is seen that although the Assessee did not offer certain amounts to tax at the time of filing the original return and sought to claim it in the revised return, the Assessee during the course of the assessment proceedings offered those amounts to tax and the assessment was completed accordingly. It has been concurrently held by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT(A)’] as well as the ITAT that the issues on which the amounts were offered to tax were debatable ones and therefore there was no occasion to levy a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. With the findings of the CIT (A) as well as the ITAT being concurrent, this Court is not inclined to interfere. 5. No substantial question of law arises. The appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. AUGUST 05, 2019 mr TALWANT SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan