The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Air Liquide Global Ec Germany Gmbh
High Court
09 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Air Liquide Global Ec Germany Gmbh
Date of order
09 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Air Liquide Global Ec Germany Gmbh, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: T 4.he appeal shall, consequently, stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~69
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 484/2024
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Anant Mann, JSC for Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate, SSC.
versus
AIR LIQUIDE GLOBAL EC GERMANY GMBH
Through: None
.....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R% 09.09.2024CM APPL. 52350/2024 (30 Days Delay in filing)
Bearing in mind the disclosures made, the delay of 30 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
The application shall stand disposed of.
ITA 484/2024
1.Having heard Mr. Mann, learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal, we note that the issue which is sought to be canvassed stands concluded against the appellant bearing in the mind the judgment rendered in The Commissioner of Income Tax-International Taxation-3 vs. Vetco Gray Pte Ltd. [ITA 448/2023 decided on 04 April 2024].
2.We had while dismissing that appeal held as follows:
“Having heard Mr. Bhatia and Mr. Jolly, learned counsels appearing for respective sides, we take note of the order passed by us on 21 January 2024 in terms of which we discern that the
questions of law which were proposed for our consideration rested solely upon Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The fact that the supply of plant and machinery was not on hire basis was not disputed on behalf of the appellants.
In that view of the matter, we find no ground to entertain the appeal or to admit them on the questions of law as suggested. The appeals fails and shall stand dismissed.”
3.Consequently, and for reasons assigned therein, this appeal shall
meet a similar fate. T
4.he appeal shall, consequently, stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 /ib
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.