The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Ariba Inc
High Court
21 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Ariba Inc
Date of order
21 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Ariba Inc, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the aforesaid, the appeals shall stand dismissed on the aforesaid score.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~47 to 53
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 732/2023, CM APPL. 63771/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63773/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) APPL. 63773/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling)
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC. Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr. S.S.Tomar, Advocates. S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
48
+ ITA 733/2023, CM APPL. 63777/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63779/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant APPL. 63779/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC. Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.,
Through:
.....Respondent
Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr.
S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
49
+ ITA 734/2023, CM APPL. 63783/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63785/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) APPL. 63785/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling)
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr. S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
50 + ITA 735/2023, CM APPL. 63807/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63809/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant
OF INCOME TAX - .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr. S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
51
+ ITA 736/2023, CM APPL. 63810/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63811/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr. S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
52
+ ITA 744/2023, CM APPL. 63874/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63876/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr. S.S.Tomar, Advocates.
53 + ITA 746/2023, CM APPL. 63887/2023 (54 Days Delay) & CM APPL. 63889/2023 (154 Days Delay in Refiling) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. SC. with Mr. Aand Mann, JSC and Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC.
versus
ARIBA INC.
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Vishal Kalra and Mr.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R21.08.2024
1.Mr. Bhatia, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, states that these appeals would merit dismissal on account of low tax effect. 2.In view of the aforesaid, the appeals shall stand dismissed on the aforesaid score.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
AUGUST 21, 2024/ib
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.