Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (Intern...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (International Taxation)-1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc Through: None

High Court 23 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (International Taxation)-1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc Through: None
Date of order
23 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - (International Taxation)-1 v. Ge Transportation Parts Llc Through: None, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is consequently dismissed subject to the above observations.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 638/2018 & CM APPL. 21938-21940/2018 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1 ..... Appellant ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus GE TRANSPORTATION PARTS LLC Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA % O R D E R23.05.2018 The sole question of law urged by the Revenue is with respect to the interest levied under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This issue is covered in the assessee’s favour and against the Revenue by the judgment of this Court in ‘Director of Income-Tax (International Taxation) vs. GE Packaged Power Inc.’, (2015) 373 ITR 65 (Delhi). It appears that the Revenue has appealed further to the Supreme Court and that its appeals are pending since leave has been granted. In these circumstances, the Court is of the opinion that the previous ruling in the assessee’s case would bind it. The ITAT did ITA 638/2018 Page 1 of 2 not commit any error in following that previous order of this Court. However, it is also clarified that in any event, the parties shall be finally bound on the question of law by the judgment/ruling of the Supreme Court in the pending batch of appeals and the special leave petitions. The appeal is consequently dismissed subject to the above observations. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MAY 23, 2018 kks A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA 638/2018 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan